The 2024 Ondo State governorship election has been under scrutiny, and a new report by the Kimpact Development Initiative (KDI) sheds light on some troubling findings. While no direct state interference was found, several irregularities raise questions about the election’s overall fairness. From vote-buying to voter registration discrepancies and BVAS bypasses, the report paints a complex picture of the electoral process.
- No evidence of direct state interference
- Widespread vote-buying reported
- Voter registration discrepancies and BVAS bypasses discovered
- Party agents accused of misconduct and violence
- Election deemed “partially free and fair”
KDI’s Findings: A Deep Dive
KDI deployed over 3,000 observers across Ondo State for the November 16th election. Their final report reveals both positive and negative aspects of the process. INEC’s logistical efficiency and transparent communication were praised, contributing to a well-organized election and timely release of results. However, serious concerns were raised about other issues.
Vote-Buying and Agent Misconduct
Vote-buying was rampant, with party agents often playing a central role. KDI observers witnessed agents interfering with the voting process, engaging in violence, and even assisting voters in marking their ballots, compromising the secrecy of the vote. In one instance, thugs were allegedly called by a party agent after a dispute over vote-buying.
Voter Registration Discrepancies
Discrepancies in voter registration numbers emerged, with significant additions and subtractions from the initial figures released by INEC. This raises questions about the accuracy and reliability of the voter register, potentially impacting the election’s outcome. Additionally, cases of overvoting and bypassing the BVAS system further erode public trust in the electoral process.
Election Security Concerns
While the election was relatively peaceful compared to previous ones, KDI documented 26 verified reports of election-related violence. These incidents, coupled with the other irregularities, cast a shadow over the election’s credibility.
Recommendations for Improvement
KDI calls for the establishment of mobile courts on election day to swiftly address violations like vote-buying and intimidation. They also urge stronger collaboration between anti-graft agencies and INEC to monitor and prosecute electoral offenses. These measures are crucial for ensuring future elections are truly free, fair, and reflect the will of the people.
What This Means for Ondo State
The “partially free and fair” designation by KDI highlights the need for significant electoral reforms. Addressing the identified issues, particularly vote-buying and systemic breaches, is crucial for strengthening democracy and ensuring future elections are conducted with greater integrity.
Was the election rigged?
While KDI found no evidence of direct state interference, the numerous irregularities they uncovered raise serious concerns about the integrity of the election. These issues must be addressed to build public trust and ensure that future elections in Ondo State are truly free and fair.
About The Author
